Converging Diverging Design Strategies In A Sophomore Level Design Sequence: Review Of An Electromechanical Project
Author(s) -
Paris von Lockette,
Eric Constans,
Jennifer Courtney,
Kevin Dahm,
William Riddell,
Roberta Harvey
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
papers on engineering education repository (american society for engineering education)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--2598
Subject(s) - capstone , comprehension , curriculum , sequence (biology) , mathematics education , computer science , engineering education , competition (biology) , design education , engineering , software engineering , engineering management , mathematics , psychology , pedagogy , programming language , algorithm , ecology , biology , genetics , art , visual arts
At our university Sophomore Clinics I and II are part of an eight-semester design sequence in which students progress from basic data collection and reverse engineering projects through more open-ended, industry-sponsored capstone design experiences. The team of multidisciplinary faculty from Engineering and Communications who teach the sophomore level courses have observed the difficulty students have tackling the fundamental open-ended nature of true design problems and have subsequently revised the sequence. For the Fall of 2005 the Sophomore Clinic sequence was revised to introduce Dym et al.’s converging-diverging framework for design by incorporating a series of three projects of increasing complexity with accompany activities designed to reinforce the converging-diverging concepts. For the third project in the series, roughly sixty students participated in an open-ended electromechanical design project that included lectures and activities to reinforce the design framework, assessment of the retention/comprehension of the framework’s concepts, and a final design competition. While assessment data was unable to show a correlation between comprehension of the design framework and improvements in students’ designs, results do show that students had adequate retention/comprehension of the converging-diverging philosophy and that students’ designs performed better in the competition following the revised course as compared to the previous year.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom