English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Generally individuals come together to work in teams to develop a task or achieve a goal. In the higher education environment most of the work done by students takes place in teams and the results of team efforts significantly affects learning outcomes When working in teams, team members are focused in developing the task. However, they constantly interact with each other in order to achieve this goal. According to McClelland’s motivation theory, individuals are motivated by three types of needs: affiliation need (nAff), achievement need (nAch) and power need (nPow). Therefore, if team members are focused on the task and socialize through interaction process while working in teams it is expected that those team members with high achievement need and affiliation need perform better than those with high power need. In teams, where team members with power need prevail over other needs, it is expected that they would try to impose their ideas making the team to perform poorly. A study with 73 engineering student teams formed between 3 and 6 members each was carried out during the spring semester 2006, at the National University of Tachira, Venezuela. The MLP, MPS, and MAFI tests were applied to measure achievement need, power need and affiliation need respectively. The TEE questionnaire was applied to measure team performance. The statistical analysis showed that achievement need prevailed in good performing teams whereas affiliation need prevailed in poor performing teams. Power need showed no statistical significant difference between good performing teams and poor performing teams. These results show that faculty should take into account individual motivation needs when forming teams in the classroom and that they should place more emphasis on forming teams where achievement need prevails rather than affiliation need.

What Motivates Engineering Students To Work In Teams?