More than Advice: Increasing Industry Advisory Board Member Involvement
Author(s) -
James Jones
Publication year - 2020
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--22847
Subject(s) - accreditation , mentorship , curriculum , advice (programming) , medical education , public relations , advisory committee , plan (archaeology) , business , political science , psychology , medicine , computer science , pedagogy , programming language , archaeology , public administration , history
Many engineering programs only involve their advisory board members in scheduled meetings, with a result that their participation and impact on these programs are limited. The objective of this paper is to examine one program’s approach to increasing and leveraging members’ impact beyond these meetings and into other areas of the curriculum and beyond. A basic premise underlying this program’s approach was that offering more ways for industry advisory board members to become involved would in fact lead to increased involvement. Specific practices reviewed in this paper include advisory board member participation in courses and laboratories, capstone courses, accreditation, student organizations, student competitive teams, and faculty development. Through this examination of the program’s efforts, other engineering educators will be able to build upon their successes and avoid some of their difficulties while involving their industry advisory board members in other ways.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom