We Can’t Get No Satisfaction!: The Relationship between Students’ Ethical Reasoning and their Satisfaction with Engineering Ethics Education
Author(s) -
Matthew A. Holsapple,
Janel Sutkus,
Donald D. Carpenter,
Cynthia Finelli,
Brian A. Burt,
Eunjong Ra,
Trevor S. Harding,
Robert Bielby
Publication year - 2020
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--18508
Subject(s) - psychology , engineering education , variance (accounting) , professional ethics , medical education , test (biology) , stratified sampling , engineering ethics , engineering , medicine , engineering management , paleontology , biology , accounting , pathology , business
Student satisfaction is a common metric for evaluating classes and other educational programs, and sometimes that satisfaction is seen as a proxy for effectiveness of those programs. For this paper, we examine student satisfaction within the context of engineering ethics education, examining the relationship between student satisfaction and ethical reasoning ability. As part of a national study of ethics education, we draw on survey data from 3,914 undergraduate engineering students, and results suggest that higher levels of ethical reasoning actually predict lower levels of satisfaction with ethics education. Further, the amount of ethics education and the methods through which it is taught also affect students’ levels of satisfaction.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom