Evaluation and Analysis of Freshman Design Courses in Engineering
Author(s) -
Tiffany Veltman,
William Rosehart,
Marjan Eggermont,
Denis Onen
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
2011 asee annual conference & exposition proceedings
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--17930
Subject(s) - cdio , engineering education , computer science , component (thermodynamics) , implementation , engineering management , mathematics education , engineering , software engineering , psychology , physics , thermodynamics
Design is a crucial component to engineering. Therefore, it is important for engineering students to learn and practice design skills early in their education. At the Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, two implementations of design education were explored; a two-semester design experience with a focus on learning-by-doing, and a single semester experience with a focus on balancing the theoretical foundations of design, communications, and project management, with practical lab workshops. The focus of this paper is the development and evaluation of criteria used to compare these two approaches to a freshman design experience. Using the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB) Graduate Attributes criteria and drawing from the Conceive-Design-ImplementOperate (CDIO) Initiative as the basis for evaluation, a detailed analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the two design courses in terms of learning outcomes is explored.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom