Assessment Measures And Outcomes For Computer Graphics Programs
Author(s) -
James Higley,
Jana Whittington,
Joy Colwell
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
engineering design graphics journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--15481
Subject(s) - curriculum , computer graphics , computer science , graphics , accreditation , plan (archaeology) , scope (computer science) , process (computing) , field (mathematics) , session (web analytics) , course evaluation , higher education , mathematics education , multimedia , medical education , psychology , world wide web , computer graphics (images) , pedagogy , medicine , mathematics , archaeology , political science , pure mathematics , law , history , programming language , operating system
Computer graphics is a fast growing field of study, which has many variable course offerings to accommodate the ever-changing technology. The differences and ambiguities in course names and degree offerings can best be explained and quantified through assessment measures. The assessment measures identify the scope of each assignment and course and identify program and department learning objectives and outcomes, and show how they are related to each other. Assessment measures also set the stage for future accreditation of a computer graphics program. This paper will discuss how to begin the assessment process for the program as a whole, and how to facilitate and use course embedded assessments within a computer graphics program and within supporting courses in other disciplines. By having a plan and a template of assessment measurement for faculty, beginning course-embedded assessments becomes an easier task for the busy faculty and will greatly improve the continuity of course offerings within the ever changing computer graphics field.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom