English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

As of May, 2004, the College of Engineering at the University of Notre Dame completed the fourth year of a two-semester, first-year engineering course sequence. During the 2003/4 academic year, a mid-year survey was administered during the final week of the first semester. This survey targeted differences among student experiences for three groups of students: (i) those who left engineering after the first semester (group 1), (ii) those who completed both semesters of the first-year course but pursued a major other than engineering (group 2) and (iii) those who remained in engineering into the sophomore year (group 3). A number of observations were derived from the survey results. First, the greatest difference in student response was observed in comparing students in group 1 with students in either group 2 or group 3. Second, students in group 1 reported a higher rate of negative experience in the firstsemester course as expressed by higher rates of occurrence of feeling “overwhelmed by the intelligence of fellow students” and “intimidated by the environment” in the course. These same students reported a lower rate of developing “relationships with new people” during the course experience. Third, in comparison to group 1 students, students in group 3 were more likely, within group activities associated with the first-year course sequence, to lead discussions, enter computer programs or calculations into a computer, operate equipment, and feel confident in expressing ideas. In comparison to group 1 students, students in group 2 were more likely to enter programs or calculations into a computer, but did not show significant differences with respect to leading discussions, operating equipment or expressing ideas. In comparing group 2 with group 3, the only statistically significant difference in response to the survey was the observation that the students in group 2 reported a higher rate of feeling “overwhelmed by the intelligence of fellow students.”

Identifying Student Differences In A First Year Engineering Course: A Comparison Of Mid Year Survey Responses