z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Whose Words Can We Trust?: Prime's Modules For Teaching And Assessing Undergraduate Learning In Information Ethics
Author(s) -
D’Arcy Randall,
Hillary Hart
Publication year - 2020
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--14525
Subject(s) - credibility , teamwork , liberal arts education , curriculum , professional responsibility , engineering ethics , face (sociological concept) , social responsibility , computer science , engineering , sociology , political science , pedagogy , public relations , higher education , social science , law
Most undergraduate engineering programs in the United States face a common problem in designing curricula that develop students’ professional responsibilities as well as their mathematical, scientific, and technical skills. As Thomas K. Grose explains, 1 ABET’s EC 2000 standards, which require that graduates possess such skills as “an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility,” 2 pose particular challenges to engineering faculty, who typically resist the kind of course content associated with liberal arts. Grose also notes a complementary “hurdle” of humanities and social science professors’ reluctance to form interdisciplinary teams with engineers.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom