z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Outcome Assessment At The U.S. Military Academy
Author(s) -
Pete Hanlon,
John E. Hill,
Bryan Goda,
Lisa A. Shay
Publication year - 2020
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--13620
Subject(s) - accreditation , commission , political science , outcome (game theory) , engineering management , engineering , medical education , engineering ethics , medicine , law , mathematics , mathematical economics
The United States Military Academy (USMA) recently had seven of its programs favorably reviewed by the Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) and the Computing Accreditation Commission (CAC) of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). The favorable comments of the review board members validated the USMA’s model for continuous assessment. USMA has developed unique practices for assessing student performance, including course diaries and extensive graduate surveys; practices that were in place before the previous ABET/CAC visit and which continue to be useful. USMA also has unique institutional structures such as a special faculty council and inter-departmental faculty goal teams that tightly integrate the development and assessment of the engineering and computer science programs across the academic program.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom