A Human Rights Challenge To The Engineering Profession
Author(s) -
Daniel R. Lynch
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
papers on engineering education repository (american society for engineering education)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--13504
Subject(s) - government (linguistics) , custodians , curriculum , engineering education , professional association , professional development , sociology , engineering ethics , political science , law , public relations , pedagogy , engineering , history , philosophy , linguistics , archaeology
In the American system we have insisted on a careful positioning of engineering education. The first professional degree occurs after 4 years of college (anomalously 5 at Dartmouth) and there is widespread commitment to university-style affiliation with non-professional students, curricula, and norms of scholarly development. We as custodians of the Engineering disciplines must understand this important achievement and what it entails vis-à-vis what should and shouldn’t be taught. We must perform against recognizable scholarly criteria – we must create, conserve, and convey the central animating ideas, the important facts, the useful analyses, and initiate careers that are authentically productive. And we must look to the intellectual nourishment of a whole professional cadre, which populates numerous external institutions and creates very specific demands on the time of our students and faculty. To fail on either of these dimensions is to lose our preferred place in American higher education. So there is much at stake in contemplating our roles in the large.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom