z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Program Improvements Resulting From Completion Of One Abet 2000 Assessment Cycle
Author(s) -
Sindee L. Simon,
Theodore F. Wiesner,
Lloyd Heinze
Publication year - 2020
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--11754
Subject(s) - session (web analytics) , identification (biology) , curriculum , test (biology) , computer science , engineering management , standardized test , software engineering , engineering , mathematics education , psychology , pedagogy , world wide web , paleontology , botany , biology
With the advent of ABET 2000, self-assessment of engineering programs has become important. To this end, it is essential to define the assessment methods and metrics against which a program will be judged. Various assessment tools exist, ranging from standardized tests to performancebased assessment to more subjective instruments, such as student surveys of their learning and/or knowledge. No assessment tool is ideal. For example, standardized exams have been criticized due to concerns of reduced instructor autonomy and alteration of curriculum goals (teaching to the test); in addition, the results of standardized tests may be influenced by student motivation. On the other hand, student self-evaluations of learning and/or knowledge are subjective. It has been argued by several researchers that combining different types of assessment tools results in a more successful assessment.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom