Program Improvements Resulting From Completion Of One Abet 2000 Assessment Cycle
Author(s) -
Sindee L. Simon,
Theodore F. Wiesner,
Lloyd Heinze
Publication year - 2020
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--11754
Subject(s) - session (web analytics) , identification (biology) , curriculum , test (biology) , computer science , engineering management , standardized test , software engineering , engineering , mathematics education , psychology , pedagogy , world wide web , paleontology , botany , biology
With the advent of ABET 2000, self-assessment of engineering programs has become important. To this end, it is essential to define the assessment methods and metrics against which a program will be judged. Various assessment tools exist, ranging from standardized tests to performancebased assessment to more subjective instruments, such as student surveys of their learning and/or knowledge. No assessment tool is ideal. For example, standardized exams have been criticized due to concerns of reduced instructor autonomy and alteration of curriculum goals (teaching to the test); in addition, the results of standardized tests may be influenced by student motivation. On the other hand, student self-evaluations of learning and/or knowledge are subjective. It has been argued by several researchers that combining different types of assessment tools results in a more successful assessment.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom