z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Comparison Of Solid Modeling Curriculum Approaches
Author(s) -
Holly K. Ault
Publication year - 2020
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--11545
Subject(s) - visualization , cad , computer science , presentation (obstetrics) , solid modeling , curriculum , graphics , solid geometry , engineering drawing , mathematics education , engineering , artificial intelligence , psychology , computer graphics (images) , pedagogy , geometry , mathematics , radiology , medicine
Many schools have recently introduced solid modeling to their curricula in Engineering Design Graphics. Some courses introduce solid modeling at the end of a traditional 2D CAD course, whereas others begin with the solid model. Some, but not all, of the concepts traditionally taught in conventional drafting or CAD courses are necessary to the development of solid models, and additional concepts are needed which are unique to solid modeling but unnecessary in conventional CAD. It is hypothesized or assumed by many that the use of solid modeling will enhance students’ visualization skills. If this is so, then which topics should be presented to the students first in order to enhance their learning and improve visualization skills? This has been the subject of much debate within the EDG community. This study looks at the development of a solid modeling based CAD course and compares the outcomes derived from varying the order of presentation of the content.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom