Enriching Freshman Design Through Collaboration With Professional Designers
Author(s) -
J. Lake,
John C. Anderson,
Charles Yarnoff,
J. Edward Colgate,
Barbara Shwom,
Penny Hirsch
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
papers on engineering education repository (american society for engineering education)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--11235
Subject(s) - creativity , the arts , professional communication , library science , product design , management , product (mathematics) , engineering , sociology , psychology , computer science , visual arts , art , mathematics , social psychology , geometry , economics
Engineering educators over the last fifteen years have increasingly emphasized the teaching of design. As a result, design courses are not only being offered as a capstone experience in engineering majors; they are increasingly found at the freshman and sophomore level. This latter development has sparked a controversy about whether it is desirable, or even possible, to teach design to freshmen. As Carol McConica explains, in a 1996 edition of Chemical Engineering Education, "Freshman design courses are problematic because students do not yet have the fundamental engineering background necessary to solve real problems."
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom