z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Designing Experiments In A Civil Engineering Curriculum
Author(s) -
James L. Klosky,
Allen Estes
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
papers on engineering education repository (american society for engineering education)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--11118
Subject(s) - accreditation , curriculum , test (biology) , engineering education , engineering design process , engineering , computer science , engineering management , engineering ethics , mechanical engineering , political science , law , paleontology , biology
As all ABET-accredited institutions become more familiar with the Engineering Criteria (EC) 2000 on which their accreditations depend, it is important for various institutions to share information on how they are meeting these new requirements. The new accreditation philosophy requires institutions to define their own missions and objectives and to develop a process of assessment and continued improvement. The emphasis is on demonstrating how the educational objectives and outcomes are being met. Many outcomes have been specifically prescribed in the now-famous criterion 3 (a-k) requirements. One of the most controversial among civil engineers has been criterion 3b which requires engineering programs to “demonstrate that graduates have an ability to design and conduct experiments, analyze and interpret data.” While most civil engineering programs conduct experiments, many have struggled with demonstrating that their students can design an experiment. This paper describes three instances where the students design experiments as part of the Civil Engineering program at the United States Military Academy.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom