Engineering Design: Using A Scoring Rubric To Compare The Products Of Teams That Differ In Gender Composition | Zendy

Robert Knecht | Zendy; Debra Lasich | Zendy; Barbara Moskal | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Engineering Design: Using A Scoring Rubric To Compare The Products Of Teams That Differ In Gender Composition

Author(s) -

Robert Knecht,

Debra Lasich,

Barbara Moskal

Publication year - 2020

Publication title -

papers on engineering education repository (american society for engineering education)

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Conference proceedings

DOI - 10.18260/1-2--10945

Subject(s) - rubric , composition (language) , team composition , field (mathematics) , engineering design process , quality (philosophy) , engineering education , computer science , population , psychology , mathematics education , engineering , engineering management , knowledge management , mathematics , sociology , mechanical engineering , epistemology , demography , pure mathematics , linguistics , philosophy

This study uses an analytic scoring rubric to evaluate the quality of the final reports that are produced by students in engineering design teams. The student teams consisted of four to six members and varied in their gender composition. Based on the results of this study, gender composition appears to have had an impact on the quality of the team submitted final reports. This paper will discuss the specific facets of the reports that varied by gender composition.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research