What makes a good biomarker?
Author(s) -
Robert L Holland
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
advances in precision medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2424-9106
pISSN - 2424-8592
DOI - 10.18063/apm.2016.01.007
Subject(s) - warrant , clinical practice , biomarker , biomarker discovery , medicine , field (mathematics) , data science , management science , engineering ethics , computer science , risk analysis (engineering) , intensive care medicine , business , engineering , family medicine , biology , mathematics , biochemistry , finance , gene , proteomics , pure mathematics
The last decade has seen an extraordinary amount of effort devoted in biomedical research to the field of biomarkers. There have been some notable successes with novel markers being adopted into clinical practice bringing clear clinical benefit to some patients — particularly with the increasing numbers of medicines being approved with companion diagnostics. However, it is fair to say that there has not yet been the numbers of clinically valuable biomarkers brought to medical practice that the research effort would seem to warrant. This paper evaluates examples of successful biomarkers, markers which might be considered partial successes and a few problematic examples and ar-gues that more effort spent in the validation phase of marker development, and less in the discovery phase might be a more efficient way to allocate research resources.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom