Why Not Study Polytonal Psychophysics?
Author(s) -
Norman D. Cook,
Takashi X. Fujisawa,
Hiroo Konaka
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
empirical musicology review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1559-5749
DOI - 10.18061/1811/24475
Subject(s) - tonality , tone (literature) , chord (peer to peer) , psychology , consonance and dissonance , cognitive dissonance , psychophysics , cognitive psychology , musical , linguistics , acoustics , perception , social psychology , computer science , philosophy , physics , neuroscience , art , distributed computing , visual arts
The relative consonance/dissonance of 2-tone intervals is well understood both experimentally and theoretically and provides a strong foundation for explaining why diatonic scales or their subsets are used in most musical cultures. Frequent textbook assertions notwithstanding, however, the consonance of intervals fails to account for the basic facts of harmony (3 or more tone combinations). We have recently shown (Cook & Fujisawa, 2006) how consideration of 3-tone psychophysics can explain the fundamental regularities of diatonic harmony. Distinct from the dissonance of 2-tone intervals, 3-tone combinations introduce an effect described by Leonard Meyer (1956) as harmonic "tension": when a third tone is located midway between an upper and a lower tone, the chord takes on an unresolved, unstable, tense character - a psychoacoustical property inherent to the diminished and augmented chords. If the effects of the upper partials are included in a formal model that includes both 2-tone and 3-tone effects, the perceived sonority of the triads (major>minor> diminished>augmented) is easily explained.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom