Evaluation of Two Interviewing Skills Measures: An Instrument Validation Study | Zendy

Cathy King Pike | Zendy; Robert J. Bennett | Zendy; Valerie Chang | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Evaluation of Two Interviewing Skills Measures: An Instrument Validation Study

Author(s) -

Cathy King Pike,

Robert J. Bennett,

Valerie Chang

Publication year - 2004

Publication title -

advances in social work

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

eISSN - 2331-4125

pISSN - 1527-8565

DOI - 10.18060/57

Subject(s) - reliability (semiconductor) , interview , construct validity , psychology , internal consistency , construct (python library) , psychometrics , applied psychology , test validity , consistency (knowledge bases) , measure (data warehouse) , clinical psychology , computer science , data mining , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence , political science , law , programming language

This article reports an initial validation of an instrument that measures basic interviewing skills and compares its psychometric results with another instrument that has been used more frequently to measure similar skills. Four field supervisors rated 30 students’ videotaped interviews (N=120) using two instruments, the validation, and a comparison instrument. The current validation instrument had high internal consistency reliability, a clear factor structure, and performed well in construct validity evaluations. These preliminary results supported the instrument’s internal consistency reliability, content, factorial, and construct validity. The validation instrument had higher internal consistency reliability, lower errormeasurement, and amore interpretable factor structure than the comparison instrument.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research