z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
North Carolina’s Changing Energy Generation Profile and Reductions in Key Air Pollutants, 2000–2019
Author(s) -
Adrien A. Wilkie,
David B. Richardson,
Thomas J. Luben,
Marc L. Serre,
Courtney G. Woods,
Julie L. Daniels
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
north carolina medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.283
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 2379-4313
pISSN - 0029-2559
DOI - 10.18043/ncm.83.4.304
Subject(s) - electricity generation , environmental science , air pollution , coal , natural gas , environmental protection , electricity , renewable energy , pollutant , criteria air contaminants , electric power , environmental engineering , waste management , air pollutants , engineering , chemistry , power (physics) , physics , electrical engineering , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics
BACKGROUND Coal combustion releases a number of airborne toxins. The North Carolina Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) of 2002 required North Carolina coal-fired power plants (CFPP) to reduce nitrogen oxides (NO X ) emissions by 2009 and sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) emissions to 2 benchmarks by 2009 and 2013. METHODS We utilized publicly available databases from the Energy Information Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency to characterize North Carolina's electricity generation profile from 2000 until 2019 and evaluate corresponding NO x and SO 2 emissions by sector over the same time period. RESULTS Between 2000 and 2008 in North Carolina, approximately 60% of electric power was generated by CFPPs. Since then, North Carolina's electric power generation has transformed from predominant dependence on coal to approximately equal dependence on natural gas and nuclear power (each at ~ 30%), with coal close behind (~ 25%). Renewables have increased, although marginally relative to the rapid increase in natural gas. Despite the stark drop in reliance on CFPPs for energy in North Carolina and subsequent drop in emissions, CFPPs still contribute ~ 60% of SO 2 air pollution as of 2017. LIMITATIONS This analysis relies upon electricity generation and emissions data self-reported by utilities and publicly available from federal agencies CONCLUSION North Carolina's electric utilities met the 2009 and 2013 regulatory benchmarks set by the CSA, which resulted in substantial reductions in SO 2 emissions from the fuel combustion electric generation sector. Still, CFPPs remain the primary utility-related and overall anthropogenic contributor of SO 2 air pollution in North Carolina.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom