English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Although the vulnerability discourse is increasingly frequent in jurisprudence, international conventions and recommendations, its meaning is still far from being univocal and coherent. This work analyzes the concept of vulnerability in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in the last fifteen years. The goal of this work is to contribute to the academic debate on vulnerability as a category that allows human rights violations to be related with their structural causes in judicial practice, opening the door to a substantive protection of human rights. Two main limits of the concept of vulnerability that is handled by the ECtHR are addressed: on the one hand, the general lack of positive measures required to the condemned State and, on the other, the use of a naturalized and homogenizing notion of vulnerable group. Finally, through the analysis of the category of “specific vulnerability”, the intersectionality approach is identified as a useful interpretative criterion to exploit the potentiality of the concept of vulnerability in the judicial praxis of the Council of Europe.

La vulnerabilidad como categoría en construcción en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos: límites y potencialidad