English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolObjetivo: Comparar la rapidez para obtener datos de frecuencia cardiaca neonatal entre el monitoreo electrocardiografico y la oximetria de pulso en neonatos. Resultados: El tiempo promedio para obtener una lectura de frecuencia cardiaca confiable usando el electrocardiograma fue en promedio de 18,8 segundos, con una mediana de 13. El tiempo promedio para obtener una lectura estable de la frecuencia cardiaca usando pulso-oximetria fue de 27,8 segundos con mediana de 26 segundos. Conclusion: En la medicion de la frecuencia cardiaca, el electrocardiograma fue 33% mas rapido que el pulso-oximetro. EnglishObjective: To compare the speed to obtain neonatal heart rate data between electrocardiographic monitoring and pulse oximetry in neonates. Methodology: The study was conducted in twenty-seven (27) neonates born by caesarean section; the heart rate was measured by pulse oximetry and electro-cardiographic monitoring. In each neonate, data was collected for a minimum of three minutes and the time in which a reliable heart rate was recorded was established. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the participating entity and the informed consent of the involved parents was obtained. Results: the average time to obtain a reliable heart rate reading using the electrocardiogram was, on average, 18.8 seconds, with a median of 13. The average time to obtain a reliable reading of the heart rate using pulse oximetry was 27.8 seconds with a median of 26. Conclusion: In the measurement of the heart rate, the electrocardiogram was 33% faster than the pulse-oximeter.

biociencias

Velocidad y eficacia en la medición de la frecuencia cardíaca con monitor cardíaco en recién nacidos de la clínica general san diego en la ciudad de Barranquilla-Colombia