English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

. The purpose of the present paper is twofold. It mainly aims at determining and defining different foreign policy discourses in Islamic republic of Iran as well as their developmental trend in the past three decades through explanation and elucidation of their particulars, components and nodal points. Actually, it seeks to explore what kind of discourses have been emerged in Iran's foreign policy during the lifetime of Islamic republic of Iran and what discursive developments have been occurred therein. Finding an answer to this fundamental question necessitates responding to some other subsidiary questions which dominate various dimensions, features and elements of each and every discourses showing a particular meaning system. What are their nodal points? What are their most important components and particulars? What do the signifiers of state-nation, Islamic revolution and international system signify? Are those discursive developments in the Iran’s foreign policy regarded as evolutions “from” one discourse to the other or taken as changes “within” discourses? Has foreign policy of Iran undergone a discourse break? In the second part, this paper has also focuses on President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s speeches while at the same time being compared with President Obama’s. There is no doubt that the two presidents who have been in the center of attention for many countries in the world for some time now, have taken part in the gener a l assembly of the United Nations in a number of occasions and presented some speeches there and their linguistic features and the phrases particularly the “Justice” metaphors made in their speeches have been scrutinized. The focus in this study has been on finding out about the number of times when the two presidents applied the term "Justice". In order to create an equal and fair basis for the comparison in the study, the authors have made an accurate record and measurement about the frequency of applying the term “Justice” in their speeches in the UN from 2010 to 2012. It seems that President Ahmadinejad has had more focus on the human rights and Justice and tried to present these words more and the reasons he has used this term have been highlighted in this paper. On the other hand, President Obama has shown a little interest in applying this word in his three speeches in the United Nations. This paper tries to analyze the outlook of both presidents linguistically and present some facts about their style of speech and the messages they try to get across.

Metaphor Analysis and Discursive Cycle of Iran's Foreign Policy: “Justice” through the lenses of US-IRAN Presidents