Theory and Practice of Awareness Measurement in Experimental Cognitive Research
Author(s) -
Almara Kulieva,
Роман Тихонов,
Иван Иванчей
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
experimental psychology (russia)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2311-7036
pISSN - 2072-7593
DOI - 10.17759/exppsy.2021140409
Subject(s) - explication , consciousness , psychology , perception , phenomenon , cognitive psychology , cognition , criticism , epistemology , rest (music) , sample (material) , social psychology , philosophy , chemistry , cardiology , neuroscience , literature , medicine , art , chromatography
Measurement of consciousness is one of the key methodological problems of cognitive experiments. The choice of method is often made without reference to a specific theory or the explication of the underlying assumptions about the nature of the phenomenon being measured. It is suggested that the lack of theoretical justification of the employed methods leads to unconstructive criticism and disagreement among researchers. We discussed the most common awareness measures in research on learning, memory, perception, and the underlying assumptions about the nature of consciousness and their relationship to theories of consciousness. The degree of theoretical justification of consciousness measures was assessed in a sample of 179 experimental articles. It was shown that in only a quarter of cases, the researchers linked the methods with corresponding assumptions about the nature of consciousness. In the rest of the cases, the choice of method was not theoretically justified.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom