z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Planning for Planet or City?
Author(s) -
Mark Davidson
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
urban planning
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.646
H-Index - 12
ISSN - 2183-7635
DOI - 10.17645/up.v1i1.604
Subject(s) - urbanization , centrality , capitalism , politics , urban planning , plan (archaeology) , order (exchange) , planet , democracy , process (computing) , sociology , environmental ethics , political science , political economy , geography , economic growth , engineering , economics , computer science , law , civil engineering , philosophy , mathematics , archaeology , finance , combinatorics , physics , astrophysics , operating system
If we now live with a planetary urban process (Brenner & Schmid, 2015a), the very idea of “future cities” must be brought into question. Indeed, we might ask whether urban planning has morphed into planetary planning, with its primary charge being the construction of vast networks of urban systems coordinating a global capitalist process. This commentary cautions against such over-extended theories of urbanization and related planning practices. Although global capitalism has engendered profound spatial changes, the concept of the city remains a crucial social and political idea. By outlining the continued centrality of the city to social and political life, the commentary argues for a democratic evaluation of the urban form in order to plan for, and realize, more just cities.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom