z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND ABDOMINAL METHODS OF HYSTERECTOMY FROM PATIENT’S PERSPECTIVE
Author(s) -
Hasan Terzi,
Pınar Solmaz Hasdemir,
S Aksu,
Ahmet Kale,
Semra Oruç Koltan
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
medical science and discovery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2148-6832
DOI - 10.17546/msd.47020
Subject(s) - medicine , perspective (graphical) , general surgery , abdominal hysterectomy , laparoscopy , hysterectomy , radiology , artificial intelligence , computer science
Aims: To compare the postoperative pain and satisfaction of the patients who operated with total laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy methods for benign gynecologic conditions. Methods: This study was a prospective randomized trial. Visual Analoque Scala and Patient Satisfaction Score Scalas were used to evaluate patients postoperative satisfaction rate. Seventyone  patients who operated by total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with 68 patients who operated by total abdominal hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications. Results: The groups were similar in respect to age, race, gravidy and parity status and uterine weight. Hospital stay, need for analgesic use, visual analoque scala pain scores in 12, 24 and 36 hours and patient satisfaction scores in 24,48 hours and 1 st weeks, blood loss were statistically less in laparoscopic hysterectomy group than abdominal hysterectomy group (p<0,001). Conclusion: Laparoscopic hysterectomy was a superior method than abdominal hysterectomy on short term follow-up, patients postoperative pain and satisfaction of the operation scar.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom