COMPETITION IN BUSINESS TAXES AND PUBLIC SERVICES: ARE PRODUCTION-BASED TAXES SUPERIOR TO CAPITAL TAXES?
Author(s) -
Elisabeth Gugl,
George R. Zodrow
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
national tax journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.43
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1944-7477
pISSN - 0028-0283
DOI - 10.17310/ntj.2015.3s.03
Subject(s) - economics , indirect tax , value added tax , public finance , tax reform , tax competition , tax deferral , public economics , production (economics) , capital (architecture) , direct tax , ad valorem tax , equity (law) , competition (biology) , finance , microeconomics , business , state income tax , macroeconomics , gross income , history , ecology , archaeology , biology , political science , law
Although most of the tax competition literature focuses on the provision of local public services to households, several papers analyze tax competition when capital taxes are used to finance local public services provided to businesses, examining the conditions under which such services are provided efficiently, under-provided, or over-provided. In addition, several prominent observers have noted that "benefit related" business taxation is desirable on both efficiency and equity grounds and argued that such taxation should take the form of a tax based on production, such as an origin-based value-added tax. We evaluate this contention in this paper, comparing the relative efficiency properties of these alternative business taxes. Our simulation results suggest that under many, but not all, circumstances it is more efficient to finance business public services with an origin-based production tax rather than a source-based capital tax.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom