The Fall of Rome Reconsidered: A Synthesis of Manpower and Taxation Arguments
Author(s) -
Jr. Stephens W. Richard
Publication year - 1982
Publication title -
social thought and research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2469-8466
pISSN - 1094-5830
DOI - 10.17161/str.1808.4925
Subject(s) - economics
The arguments given for the decline and fall of Rome are many and varied. Two in particular have dominated the lit erature. One, supported by Max Weber, A.E.R. Boak and others, contends that the transition from ancient civilization to feudalism was due to the fall in supply of slaves and the ramifications of that fall on the ability of other elements in the system to be reproduced. A.H.M. Jones, A. Bernardi, C.M. Cipolla, and others have challenged this argument and have offered an alternative which focuses on the economic limita tions of an agrarian based empire. The problem was manifest in an exceedingly oppressive system of taxation which also prevented system reproduction. These alternative arguments are synthesized in this paper by employing Marx's concept of reserve industrial army and explaining its operation with respect to various rates of exploitation. The result is a step to a more comprehensive explanation of Rome's decline and fall.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom