z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 and IDEA Regulations of 2006: Implications for Educators, Administrators, and Teacher Trainers
Author(s) -
Mitchell L. Yell,
James G. Shriner,
Antonis Katsiyannis
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
focus on exceptional children
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 0015-511X
DOI - 10.17161/foec.v39i1.6824
Subject(s) - education act , special education , psychology , process (computing) , federal law , state (computer science) , individualized education program , affect (linguistics) , no child left behind , title iii , state law , pedagogy , medical education , law , public relations , political science , legislation , statute , accountability , medicine , communication , algorithm , computer science , operating system
First we briefly review the reauthorization process. Next we consider the influential effect that No Child Left Behind and two major reports had on Congress when it reauthorized the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Third, we discuss major changes to the law. We conclude with an examination of how the law will directly affect special educators, administrators, and teacher trainers. As we address these topics, we caution the reader that (a) courts will clarify many of the provisions, and (b) states will have to change their special education regulations to align with IDEIA. To understand and implement IDEIA appropriately, teachers and administrators will have to monitor these due process hearings, court cases, and state law, regulations, and guidelines.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom