z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Social Safety Net: An Alternative to Rawl's Two Principles of Justice
Author(s) -
J. Winston Chiong
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
auslegung a journal of philosophy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2376-6727
pISSN - 0733-4311
DOI - 10.17161/ajp.1808.9434
Subject(s) - impartiality , original position , framing (construction) , appeal , primary goods , sociology , rationality , economic justice , epistemology , law and economics , law , political science , philosophy , structural engineering , engineering
In A Theory of Justice, John Rawls argues for a view which he entitles "justice as fairness," according to which the principles of a just social organization are those which would be chosen by the members of society in an original position of fairness. Rawls's framing of this original position has had a great intuitive appeal, perhaps because it incorporates the ideals of rationality and impartiality that are central to our everyday understanding of justice. However, the principles which Rawls derives from this startingpoint appear to depart radically from many commonly held and intuit ive beliefs about jus t ice and the aims of social organizations.While I find Rawls's conception of the original position to be uniquely compelling, I believe that there is something to be said for a somewhat more conservative conception of justice. Rawls himself acknowledges the possible independence of the original position from the substantive principles which he endorses, pointing out that

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom