English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Me In the PhenomejrcolpgY of Perception, Maurice rleau-Ponty criticizes ""the "prejudice toward the objective world" 1 which, he says, contaminates philosophy. Under the influence of this prejudice, philosophers have used "objective data"--data which does not come from perception but from other sources such as science--to study perception, instead of using the actual subjective data of perception. The result has been a history of inaccurate theories of perception and knowledge. One expression of Merleau-Ponty's critique of this prejudice is his thesis of the ambiguity of time, which he approaches through a discussion of the constitution of the body as an object. Although Merleau-Ponty does not explicitly say so, a close examination of this thesis reveals that object-oriented appraches to philosophy do not take into account the ambiguity of time.

Ambiguity of Time, Self, and Philosophical Explanation in Merleau-Ponty, Husserl, and Hume