Ambiguity of Time, Self, and Philosophical Explanation in Merleau-Ponty, Husserl, and Hume
Author(s) -
Laura Duhan
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
auslegung a journal of philosophy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2376-6727
pISSN - 0733-4311
DOI - 10.17161/ajp.1808.9142
Subject(s) - ambiguity , philosophy , epistemology , phenomenology (philosophy) , psychoanalysis , psychology , linguistics
Me In the PhenomejrcolpgY of Perception, Maurice rleau-Ponty criticizes ""the "prejudice toward the objective world" 1 which, he says, contaminates philosophy. Under the influence of this prejudice, philosophers have used "objective data"--data which does not come from perception but from other sources such as science--to study perception, instead of using the actual subjective data of perception. The result has been a history of inaccurate theories of perception and knowledge. One expression of Merleau-Ponty's critique of this prejudice is his thesis of the ambiguity of time, which he approaches through a discussion of the constitution of the body as an object. Although Merleau-Ponty does not explicitly say so, a close examination of this thesis reveals that object-oriented appraches to philosophy do not take into account the ambiguity of time.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom