z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Bridging the Gap: Overtime Gap Time under the Fair Labor Standards Act
Author(s) -
Hannah Schoeb
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
kansas law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1942-9258
pISSN - 0083-4025
DOI - 10.17161/1808.26271
Subject(s) - overtime , bridging (networking) , labour economics , business , economics , computer science , computer security
Imagine a hardworking employee, Ernst. Ernst is hired to complete low skill, hard labor at a slaughterhouse for twelve dollars per hour. He speaks little English, is not well known to his employer, and is far from indispensable. Each day, Ernst arrives thirty minutes before his assigned shift to set up his work station, works through lunch, and, because the slaughterhouse expects him to complete significant post-shift duties, leaves work thirty minutes after clocking out. The slaughterhouse automatically deducts a full lunch hour from Ernst’s recorded hours every day without regard to whether he ate lunch. Because Ernst receives no compensation for the time he spends working through lunch, nor for his pre-shift and post-shift work, the slaughterhouse fails to compensate Ernst for ten work hours per week.1 Thus, though Ernst typically works a fortyfive hour week, he only receives compensation for thirty-five hours. How can Ernst redress this mistake? As a practical matter, he cannot sue his employer in contract, because he cannot afford to anger his employer and risk his livelihood. The United States Department of Labor exists to protect employees from such exploitation, and ordinarily might independently step in to investigate without requiring Ernst to initiate legal action.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom