z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Resolution of Common Questions in MDL Proceedings
Author(s) -
Andrew R. Smith,
Kirkland Partner,
Ellis Llp
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
kansas law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1942-9258
pISSN - 0083-4025
DOI - 10.17161/1808.25709
Subject(s) - resolution (logic) , computer science , artificial intelligence
This article addresses one particular aspect of MDL procedures — the use of MDL proceedings to resolve common issues of fact or law that may be dispositive for the entire litigation or certain categories of claims. The article presents evidence demonstrating that this has been one of the most effective aspects of MDL litigation in terms of bringing litigation to a close and effectively and fairly resolving claims. Where litigants have taken advantage of these procedures, a number of MDL proceedings have been significantly narrowed or entirely resolved through summary judgment or other proceedings on common issues central to the litigation. The full implementation of such procedures can only further the MDL process as an effective means of resolving large scale, complex litigation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom