z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Global Convergence of Global Settlements
Author(s) -
Adam S. Zimmerman,
Jack Weinstein,
Kenneth R. Feinberg,
Samuel Issacharoff,
David Michael Jaros,
Dana Remus,
Jay Tidmarsh
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
kansas law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1942-9258
pISSN - 0083-4025
DOI - 10.17161/1808.25579
Subject(s) - human settlement , convergence (economics) , geography , economic geography , economics , archaeology , economic growth
Conventional wisdom says that the American-style class action will never go global. Even as some countries develop innovative ways to handle enormous cases—from Netherland’s settlement-only approach to mass torts to Japan’s recent adoption of class actions—a number of factors have slowed their growth abroad. Such barriers include: (1) bans on contingency fees, (2) “loser-pay” rules that increase the financial risk of complex litigation for plaintiffs, and (3) collective actions that, in many cases, require that all parties affirmatively “opt-in” to participate. These features of collective actions will continue to limit the incentives, stakes, and finality of large settlements forged overseas. This resistance reflects, in some ways, what some say is the uniquely “bottom-up” nature of American litigation. In “top-down” justice

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom