Rape by Nonphysical Coercion: State v. Brooks
Author(s) -
Elizabeth Hanus
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
kansas law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1942-9258
pISSN - 0083-4025
DOI - 10.17161/1808.25544
Subject(s) - coercion (linguistics) , state (computer science) , political science , criminology , psychoanalysis , psychology , philosophy , computer science , linguistics , algorithm
What is and is not considered rape is far from clear. For instance, which of these threats, if any, are criminal under rape law? “If you don’t have sex with me, I’m going to file for divorce, get custody of the kids, and you will never see them again.” “If you don’t have sex with me, I’m going to report you to immigration.” “If you don’t have sex with me, I’m going to break up with you.” Currently, none of these threats would be captured under rape laws in many jurisdictions in the United States. 1 However, based on the Kansas Supreme Court’s interpretation of section 21-5503 of the Kansas Criminal Code in State v. Brooks, a defendant could be guilty of rape if the victim was “overcome by fear” due to any of these threats. 2
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom