English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

“Definitions of the word ‘edible’ are scarcely essential, since its meaning is so well known.” 1 Initially, such a statement seems uncontroversial. Something is edible if it can be eaten. Yet, when the word is examined more carefully, its definition soon becomes much less clear. Is anything that can be eaten edible? Are poisonous berries edible? Is an airplane edible if someone eats it? 2 If “something that can be eaten” is not a workable definition of edible, what alternative, or alternatives, should be used? Such questions are not posed merely as an intellectual exercise, but have important economic ramifications. When a good is imported into the United States, it is classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 3 The word edible shows up repeatedly throughout the HTSUS, and whether a good is edible often affects its classification. A good’s classification in turn determines in large part the applicable tariff rate. 4 The applicable tariff rate ultimately affects how much the government may collect in tariffs and how much an importer must pay.

Chewing it Over: Determining the Meaning of Edible In the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States