z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Private Enforcement of the Kansas Wage Payment Act
Author(s) -
Joseph A. Schremmer,
Sean McGivern
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
kansas law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1942-9258
pISSN - 0083-4025
DOI - 10.17161/1808.20274
Subject(s) - payment , enforcement , business , wage , labour economics , finance , economics , law , political science
We are practitioners, and in our practice we meet with many prospective clients who have worked, for a wage, but have not been paid by their employers. Unfortunately, there is nothing we as private lawyers can do for a majority of these people. The problem is not that the law provides no relief. Kansas, in fact, has a set of statutes on the books that makes it illegal for employers to fail to pay their wage-earning employees and penalizes violators. These laws, known as the Kansas Wage Payment Act (KWPA or Act), however, are not adequately enforced. For this reason, we argue here, the law should incentivize private enforcement. The most effective means of doing so is to amend the KWPA to include an attorney fee shift that favors prevailing plaintiffs, i.e., prevailing employees. In the status quo, the KWPA provides for two mechanisms of enforcement. First, the state of Kansas, through the Kansas Department of Labor (KDOL), is authorized to investigate and adjudicate employee wage complaints administratively. Second, the KWPA provides a private cause action for individual employees who are aggrieved under the Act. Even together these enforcement mechanisms have proved unable to vindicate a substantial number of Kansas employees victimized by wage theft. The

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom