English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Home television watchers have long enjoyed the right to “timeshift,” or record a program for later viewing. In the 1980s, time-shifting was accomplished using a videocassette recorder (VCR) and a blank tape. This technology was eventually replaced with digital video recorders (DVRs), devices that write television content onto a hard drive. The right of television watchers to time-shift was held to be fair use of copyrighted content by the Supreme Court in the landmark case Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. Time-shifting was recently put under renewed scrutiny regarding a novel digital video recording technology developed by Cablevision, a cable television provider. The Remote Storage Digital Video Recorder (RS-DVR) is a service that allows cable subscribers to record and play back video content in the absence of a set-top DVR. Instead, time-shifted programs are copied onto remote servers controlled and maintained at Cablevision’s head-end, a central facility that houses the hardware on which the content is copied and stored.

Copyright Infringement in the Ether: RAM Buffering and the Copyright Act’s Duration Requirement