English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A motion to dismiss on grounds of forum non conveniens has become the primary response of domestic defendants to tort actions brought by foreign plaintiffs in U.S. courts. The motion is not only filed, but also granted, in nearly every case. Various elements of the modern doctrine of forum non conveniens almost guarantee this outcome where the alleged wrongful act and injury occurred in another country. A forum non conveniens dismissal typically means that a foreign plaintiff must seek relief in the courts of his own country. As a result, a foreign plaintiff will likely recover much less than a domestic plaintiff injured by a domestic company. The various procedural and substantive

university of kansas law review

Forum Non Conveniens and Retaliatory Legislation: The Impact on the Available Alternative Forum Inquiry and on the Desirability of Forum Non Conveniens as a Defense Tactic