Predicting Older Adults’ On-Road Driving Performance
Author(s) -
Rachel W. Jones Ross,
Charles T. Scialfa,
Scheila Tatiana Duarte Cordazzo,
Katherine Bubric
Publication year - 2013
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.17077/drivingassessment.1494
Subject(s) - perception , test (biology) , hazard , driving test , predictive validity , sample (material) , computer science , psychology , statistics , machine learning , clinical psychology , mathematics , paleontology , chemistry , logistic regression , organic chemistry , chromatography , neuroscience , biology
The authors examined the predictive utility of the Roadwise Review and the Hazard Perception Test on a standardized driving assessment using both conventional and alternative scoring criteria in a sample of health older adults (N= 57). The results indicate that both tests can predict passing or failing the road evaluation. The Hazard Perception Test was more consistent in predicting total points and hazardous errors in on-road performance. Future research should examine the predictive validity of these tests in cognitively impaired drivers.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom