z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
R We Fooling Ourselves: Does the Occlusion Technique Shortchange R Estimates?
Author(s) -
Christopher A. Monk,
David G. Kidd
Publication year - 2007
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.17077/drivingassessment.1206
Subject(s) - task (project management) , occlusion , computer science , computer vision , shutter , artificial intelligence , cognition , psychology , engineering , medicine , mechanical engineering , systems engineering , neuroscience , cardiology
The occlusion technique was originally used to evaluate the cognitive demands of the roadway. Recently, the occlusion technique has been used as a cost-effective tool for assessing the visual demand of in-vehicle devices. Occlusions simulate glances from an in-vehicle device to the roadway by interrupting visual sampling. However, occluding the in-vehicle device does not impose any additional cognitive demand on the participant like true glances back to the roadway. The purpose of this study was to compare standard no-task occlusions with occlusions requiring participants to perform a visual-motor tracking task. Results suggest that overestimates of resumability may result by not including a task during occlusions. Furthermore, estimations of visual demand based on individual post-occlusion resumption times may provide a more precise measure of transition costs and resumability than measures based on Total Shutter Open Time.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom