A Tale of Two Sectors: Why is Misallocation Higher in Services than in Manufacturing? | Zendy

Daniel A. Dias | Zendy; Carlos Robalo Marques | Zendy; Christine Richmond | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

A Tale of Two Sectors: Why is Misallocation Higher in Services than in Manufacturing?

Author(s) -

Daniel A. Dias,

Carlos Robalo Marques,

Christine Richmond

Publication year - 2018

Publication title -

international finance discussion paper

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

eISSN - 2767-4509

pISSN - 1073-2500

DOI - 10.17016/ifdp.2018.1229

Subject(s) - tertiary sector of the economy , manufacturing sector , productivity , economics , labour economics , manufacturing , gross output , distribution (mathematics) , closing (real estate) , aggregate (composite) , service (business) , business , production (economics) , microeconomics , macroeconomics , economy , mathematics , finance , mathematical analysis , marketing , materials science , composite material

Recent empirical studies document that the level of resource misallocation in the service sector is significantly higher than in the manufacturing sector. We quantify the importance of this difference and study its sources. Conservative estimates for Portugal (2008) show that closing this gap, by reducing misallocation in the service sector to manufacturing levels, would boost aggregate gross output by around 12 percent and aggregate value added by around 31 percent. Differences in the effect and size of productivity shocks explain most of the gap in misallocation between manufacturing and services, while the remainder is explained by differences in firm productivity and age distribution. We interpret these results as stemming mainly from higher output-price rigidity, higher labor adjustment costs, and higher informality in the service sector.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research