Inflation, Taxes, and the Durability of Capital
Author(s) -
Darrel Cohen,
Kevin A. Hassett
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
finance and economics discussion series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2767-3898
pISSN - 1936-2854
DOI - 10.17016/feds.1997.53
Subject(s) - depreciation (economics) , asset (computer security) , economics , monetary economics , inflation (cosmology) , distortion (music) , capital (architecture) , sign (mathematics) , investment (military) , fixed asset , econometrics , macroeconomics , capital formation , microeconomics , physics , production (economics) , mathematics , computer science , theoretical physics , history , computer security , cmos , law , amplifier , mathematical analysis , archaeology , profit (economics) , financial capital , political science , optoelectronics , politics
Auerbach (1979, 1981) has demonstrated that inflation can lead to large inter-asset distortions, with the negative effects of higher inflation unambiguously declining with asset life. We show that this is true only if depreciation is treated as geometric for tax purposes. When depreciation is straightline, higher inflation can have the opposite effect, discouraging investment in long-lived assets. Since our current system can be thought of as a mixture of straightline and geometric, the sign of the inter-asset distortion is indeterminate. We show that under current U.S. tax rules, the "straightline" and "geometric" effects approximately cancel for equipment, causing almost no inter-asset distortions. For structures, inflation clearly causes substitution into long-lived assets.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom