Removed to the Signifier: Utopia in Stephen Graham Jones’s The Bird Is Gone: A Monograph Manifesto (2003)
Author(s) -
Kristina Baudemann
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
open library of humanities
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.168
H-Index - 6
ISSN - 2056-6700
DOI - 10.16995/olh.232
Subject(s) - manifesto , utopia , indigenous , colonialism , style (visual arts) , span (engineering) , art history , meaning (existential) , history , space (punctuation) , literature , sociology , aesthetics , philosophy , art , law , epistemology , political science , linguistics , archaeology , ecology , civil engineering , biology , engineering
This article deals with the speculative utopia in Stephen Graham Jones’s the bird is gone: a monograph manifesto (2003). Arguing that Jones foregrounds the utopian traits of US-American colonialism, specifically of Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal policy, I explore the conditions of a postcolonial — or rather decolonial — Indigenous-centered utopia. As exemplified in Jones’s monograph manifesto, the latter does not consist in setting Indigenous communities back to a pre-colonial default state because colonialism is not reversible. The utopian space is instead moved from the level of representation to the level of signifiers, where it exists in a space of possibility opens up in the continuous shift of meaning/signifieds and humorous play with readerly expectations. As such, Jones’s work not only dislodges and subverts, but also renews literary utopia. In its focus on colonial history and textual experimentation, bird demonstrates that utopia can serve as both a space for settler colonial exploitation and a tool kit for imagining a decolonial and Indigenous-centered future.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom