z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Functional priorities, assistive technology, and brain-computer interfaces after spinal cord injury
Author(s) -
Jennifer L. Collinger,
Michael L. Boninger,
Tim M. Bruns,
Kenneth C. Curley,
Wei Wang,
Douglas J. Weber
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
the journal of rehabilitation research and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1938-1352
pISSN - 0748-7711
DOI - 10.1682/jrrd.2011.11.0213
Subject(s) - tetraplegia , brain–computer interface , physical medicine and rehabilitation , wheelchair , spinal cord injury , rehabilitation , functional electrical stimulation , quality of life (healthcare) , activities of daily living , bridge (graph theory) , affect (linguistics) , medicine , assistive technology , psychology , physical therapy , computer science , applied psychology , human–computer interaction , spinal cord , nursing , neuroscience , stimulation , communication , electroencephalography , world wide web
Spinal cord injury (SCI) often affects a person's ability to perform critical activities of daily living and can negatively affect his or her quality of life. Assistive technology aims to bridge this gap in order to augment function and increase independence. It is critical to involve consumers in the design and evaluation process as new technologies such as brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are developed. In a survey study of 57 veterans with SCI participating in the 2010 National Veterans Wheelchair Games, we found that restoration of bladder and bowel control, walking, and arm and hand function (tetraplegia only) were all high priorities for improving quality of life. Many of the participants had not used or heard of some currently available technologies designed to improve function or the ability to interact with their environment. The majority of participants in this study were interested in using a BCI, particularly for controlling functional electrical stimulation to restore lost function. Independent operation was considered to be the most important design criteria. Interestingly, many participants reported that they would consider surgery to implant a BCI even though noninvasiveness was a high-priority design requirement. This survey demonstrates the interest of individuals with SCI in receiving and contributing to the design of BCIs.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom