z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Human temporal bones versus mechanical model to evaluate three middle ear transducers
Author(s) -
Christof Stieger,
H. Christian Bernhard,
Daniela Waeckerlin,
Martin Kompis,
Jürgen Burger,
Rudolf Haeusler
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
the journal of rehabilitation research and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1938-1352
pISSN - 0748-7711
DOI - 10.1682/jrrd.2006.09.0114
Subject(s) - transducer , middle ear , acoustics , bridge (graph theory) , range (aeronautics) , materials science , biomedical engineering , engineering , physics , anatomy , medicine , composite material
A life-size mechanical middle ear model and human temporal bones were used to evaluate three different middle ear transducers for implantable hearing aids: the driving rod transducer (DRT), the floating mass transducer (FMT) or vibrant sound bridge, and the contactless transducer (CLT). Results of the experiments with the mechanical model were within the range of the results for human temporal bones. However, results with the mechanical model showed better reproducibility. The handling of the mechanical model was considerably simpler and less time-consuming. Systematic variations of mounting parameters showed that the angle of the rod has virtually no effect on the output of the DRT, the mass loading on the cable of the FMT has a larger impact on the output than does the tightness of crimping, and the output level of the CLT can be increased by 10 dB by optimizing the mounting parameters.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom