z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Methods to measure sensory function in humans versus animals
Author(s) -
Alberto MartinezArizala
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
the journal of rehabilitation research and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1938-1352
pISSN - 0748-7711
DOI - 10.1682/jrrd.2003.08.0035
Subject(s) - sensation , quantitative sensory testing , sensory system , physical medicine and rehabilitation , spinal cord injury , perception , pain sensation , psychology , sensory threshold , medicine , cognitive psychology , neuroscience , spinal cord , anesthesia
Sensation is perhaps one of the most complex senses. It allows us to experience our environment, and it provides ongoing feedback for the performance of accurate motor tasks. The present methods used for clinical testing of sensation in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) rely on traditional techniques developed many years ago. This type of testing has been incorporated into the ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) score, which has become the principal instrument for measuring the recovery of sensory function in humans. Unfortunately, the ASIA score lacks sophistication and is not quantitative. Similar shortcomings are found in the testing of sensation in experimental animal models of SCI. Although highly refined methods have been developed for the study of sensation and pain perception in animals, these methods have not been incorporated for measuring recovery of function in experimental SCI. A review of the available literature suggests that further refined and quantifiable tests need to be developed in this area.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom