z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Supplemental Control of Lepidopterous Pests on Bt Transgenic Sweet Corn with Biologically-Based Spray Treatments
Author(s) -
Robert R. Farrar,
B. Merle Shepard,
Martin Shapiro,
Richard L. Hassell,
Mark. L. Schaffer,
Chad. M. Smith
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of insect science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1536-2442
DOI - 10.1673/031.009.0801
Subject(s) - helicoverpa zea , biology , fall armyworm , noctuidae , bacillus thuringiensis , tassel , genetically modified maize , lepidoptera genitalia , spinosad , agronomy , pest analysis , biopesticide , biological pest control , genetically modified crops , zea mays , horticulture , botany , transgene , pesticide , spodoptera , recombinant dna , biochemistry , genetics , gene , bacteria
Biologically-based spray treatments, including nucleopolyhedroviruses, neem, and spinosad, were evaluated as supplemental controls for the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith), and corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), on transgenic sweet corn, Zea mays (L.) (Poales: Poaceae), expressing a Cry1Ab toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner (Bacillales: Bacillaceae) (Bt). Overall, transgenic corn supported lower densities of both pests than did nontransgenic corn. Control of the fall armyworm was improved in both whorl-stage and tassel-stage corn by the use of either a nucleopolyhedrovirus or neem, but the greatest improvement was seen with spinosad. Only spinosad consistently reduced damage to ears, which was caused by both pest species. In general, efficacy of the spray materials did not differ greatly between transgenic and nontransgenic corn.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom