Open AccessCarcinoma of Unknown Primary Site: Sequential Treatment with Paclitaxel/Carboplatin/Etoposide and Gemcitabine/Irinotecan: A Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network Phase II Trial
Author(s) -
Greco F. Anthony,
Rodriguez Gladys I.,
Shaffer Don W.,
Hermann Robert,
Litchy Sharlene,
Yardley Denise A.,
Burris Howard A.,
Morrissey Lisa H.,
Erland Joan B.,
Hainsworth John D.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
the oncologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.176
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1549-490X
pISSN - 1083-7159
DOI - 10.1634/theoncologist.9-6-644
Subject(s) - medicine , irinotecan , carboplatin , gemcitabine , etoposide , regimen , oncology , chemotherapy , oxaliplatin , surgery , cancer , colorectal cancer , cisplatin
Purpose . To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the sequential administration of paclitaxel (Taxol ® ; Bristol‐Myers Squibb; Princeton, NJ), carboplatin (Paraplatin ® ; Bristol‐Myers Squibb), and oral etoposide (VePesid ® ; Bristol‐Myers Squibb) followed by gemcitabine (Gemzar ® ; Eli Lilly; Indianapolis, IN) and irinotecan (Campostar ® ; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals; New York, NY) in the first‐line treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site. Patients and Methods . One hundred thirty‐two patients were treated with sequential combination chemotherapy for a maximum of six cycles. All patients had relatively poor prognostic features. Fifty‐nine patients had well‐differentiated adenocarcinoma, 73 patients had poorly differentiated carcinoma, and 121 patients had performance status scores of 0 or 1. Results . Thirty‐three (30%) of 111 assessable patients (95% confidence interval 27%–33%) had objective responses to treatment (26 partial responses, seven complete responses). The combination of gemcitabine and irinotecan was associated with significantly less toxicity than the triple‐drug regimen and improved the responses in several patients (10%). The response rates were similar in the two major histologic tumor types, but were lower for patients with liver‐dominant tumors (13%) and higher for patients with lymph‐node‐dominant tumors (50%). The median progression‐free survival time, median survival time, and actuarial survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 5.7 months, 9.1 months, 35%, and 16%, respectively. Conclusions . Sequential combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel/carboplatin/oral etoposide and gemcitabine/irinotecan is an active treatment for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site, but overall toxicities are greater than those seen with other combinations of new drugs and survival appears similar to that observed in 264 other patients treated in our four previous phase II trials. A better understanding of the biology of these heterogeneous tumors will likely lead to improved therapy for these patients.