
Phase II Study of Low‐Dose Afatinib Maintenance Treatment Among Patients with EGFR ‐Mutated Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 1601 ( NJLCG1601 )
Author(s) -
Nakamura Atsushi,
Tanaka Hisashi,
Saito Ryota,
Suzuki Aya,
Harada Toshiyuki,
Inoue Sumito,
Yamada Toru,
Nakagawa Taku,
Jingu Daisuke,
Sugawara Shunichi
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the oncologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.176
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1549-490X
pISSN - 1083-7159
DOI - 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0545
Subject(s) - afatinib , medicine , lung cancer , tolerability , rash , clinical endpoint , adverse effect , oncology , regimen , toxicity , erlotinib , surgery , clinical trial , cancer , epidermal growth factor receptor
Lessons Learned Low‐dose afatinib maintenance treatment among patients with EGFR ‐mutated NSCLC achieved long‐time to treatment failure with fewer treatment‐related AEs without detracting from the therapeutic efficacy. This modified regimen represents a practical usage that balances effectiveness and safety.Background Although afatinib is an effective therapy for patients with EGFR ‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), drug‐related adverse events (AEs) have often necessitated dose reductions. In a post hoc analysis of the LUX‐Lung 3 and 6 trials, there was no difference in median progression‐free survival (PFS) between patients who had the dose of afatinib reduced and those who did not. We thus evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of low‐dose afatinib maintenance treatment among patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who had not been previously treated. Methods Eligible patients received afatinib 40 mg orally once daily. When prescribed grade ≥ 2 AEs, rash of grade ≥ 3, or unacceptable toxicity occurred, the afatinib dose was reduced from 40 to 30 mg and if needed from 30 to 20 mg. The primary endpoint was the 1‐year PFS rate. Secondary endpoints were PFS, overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity. Results Among 30 patients, 93% had adenocarcinoma, 53% had exon 19 deletion, 37% had L858R, and 10% had minor mutations. The 1‐year PFS rate was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.3–66.1) and the median PFS was 11.8 months (95% CI, 7.1–21.4). The incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 toxicities was 57%, including elevated aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase level (13%), diarrhea (10%), and paronychia (10%). Conclusion Low‐dose afatinib maintenance treatment reduced treatment‐related AEs without detracting from the therapeutic efficacy.