z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Environmental and Psychosocial Barriers to and Benefits of Cervical Cancer Screening in Kenya
Author(s) -
Buchanan Lunsford Natasha,
Ragan Kathleen,
Lee Smith Judith,
Saraiya Mona,
Aketch Millicent
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
the oncologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.176
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1549-490X
pISSN - 1083-7159
DOI - 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0213
Subject(s) - medicine , psychosocial , outreach , focus group , cervical cancer , family medicine , embarrassment , cervical screening , cancer screening , stigma (botany) , cancer , psychiatry , social psychology , marketing , political science , law , business , psychology
Background Cervical cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in females and is a leading cause of cancer‐related mortality in Kenya; limited cervical cancer screening services may be a factor. Few studies have examined men's and women's perceptions on environmental and psychosocial barriers and benefits related to screening. Materials and Methods In 2014, 60 women aged 25–49 years and 40 male partners participated in 10 focus groups (6 female and 4 male), in both rural and urban settings (Nairobi and Nyanza, Kenya), to explore perceptions about barriers to and benefits of cervical cancer screening. Focus groups were segmented by sex, language, geographic location, and screening status. Data were transcribed, translated into English, and analyzed by using qualitative software. Results Participants identified screening as beneficial for initiating provider discussions about cancer but did not report it as a beneficial method for detecting precancers. Perceived screening barriers included access (transportation, cost), spousal approval, stigma, embarrassment during screening, concerns about speculum use causing infertility, fear of residual effects of test results, lack of knowledge, and religious or cultural beliefs. All participants reported concerns with having a male doctor perform screening tests; however, men uniquely reported the young age of a doctor as a barrier. Conclusion Identifying perceived barriers and benefits among people in low‐ and middle‐income countries is important to successfully implementing emerging screening programs. The novel findings on barriers and benefits from this study can inform the development of targeted community outreach activities, communication strategies, and educational messages for patients, families, and providers. Implications for Practice This article provides important information for stakeholders in clinical practice and research when assessing knowledge, beliefs, and acceptability of cervical cancer screening and treatment services in low‐ and middle‐resourced countries. Formative research findings provide information that could be used in the development of health interventions, community education messages, and materials. Additionally, this study illuminates the importance of understanding psychosocial barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening, community education, and reduction of stigma as important methods of improving prevention programs and increasing rates of screening among women.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here